Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Care Research and Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1077558707304634v1
64/5/568    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leibowitz, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leibowitz, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, S. L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Traveler's Health
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Distance to Public Test Sites and HIV Testing

Arleen A. Leibowitz

Department of Public Policy, UCLA School of Public Affairs, Arleen{at}ucla.edu

Stephanie L. Taylor

RAND, Stephanie_Taylor{at}rand.org

This article examines how proximity to the nearest publicly funded test site affects HIV testing. Using a sample of 5,361 Los Angeles County adults, multinomial logit models estimated simultaneously the likelihood of (1) obtaining an HIV test in the prior 2 years, and (2) testing in a private physician's office, a publicly funded medical clinic, or in a nonmedical setting, such as a bar or bathhouse. Low-income Los Angeles residents rely on publicly funded sites for HIV testing. When public sites are more distant, poor individuals are less likely to use them and less likely to get tested. Distance from public sites does not affect HIV testing among the nonpoor. To encourage HIV testing among the groups where HIV is growing fastest, public health agencies must keep the time and money costs of HIV testing low.

Key Words: HIV testing • distance • disparities • publicly funded HIV testing • Los Angeles

This version was published on October 1, 2007

Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 64, No. 5, 568-584 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1077558707304634


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?