This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1077558708324340v1 66/1/97    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cummings, J. R. Articles by Hanoch, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cummings, J. R. Articles by Hanoch, Y. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Medicare Prescription Drug Coverage Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Who Thinks That Part D Is Too Complicated? Survey Results on the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit

University of California, Los Angeles

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: trice{at}conet.ucla.edu.

	Abstract

Evidence suggests that Medicare Part D plan ownership is "sticky"; beneficiaries are unlikely to change plans from year to year, even when it would be in their financial interest to do so. The complexity of the program may contribute to this problem. Using data from a national survey, the authors examine the characteristics of those who believe that Part D is too complicated as well as the characteristics of those who endorse one of two policies to simplify the program. The results indicate that a great majority of adults believe that the program is too complicated and most favor some form of simplification. In multivariate analyses, one of the most consistent predictors is political orientation. Republicans are significantly less likely to think that Part D is too complicated, and liberals and moderates are significantly more likely to favor allowing beneficiaries the option of purchasing a plan directly from the government.

First published on October 3, 2008, doi:10.1177/1077558708324340

Medical Care Research and Review 2009;66:97.

A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?