This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 1077558708319734v1 65/6/655    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Barr, J. K. Articles by Miranda, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Barr, J. K. Articles by Miranda, D. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Physicians' Views on Public Reporting of Hospital Quality Data

¹ Qualidigm
² RTI International
³ Baruch College
⁴ CMS Center for Beneficiary Choices

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jbarr{at}qualidigm.org.

	Abstract

This article describes physicians’ responses to patient questions and physicians’ views about public reports on hospital quality. Interviews with 56 office-based physicians in seven states/regions used hypothetical scenarios of patients questioning referrals based on public reports of hospital quality. Responses were analyzed using an iterative coding process to develop categories and themes from data. Four themes describe physicians’ responses to patients: (a) rely on existing physician–patient relationships, (b) acknowledge and consider patient perspectives, (c) take actions to follow up on patient concerns, and (d) provide patients’ perspectives on quality reports. Three themes summarize responses to hospital quality reports: perceived lack of methodological rigor, content considerations in reports, and attitudes/experience regarding reports. Findings suggest that physicians take seriously patients’ questions about hospital-quality reports and consider changing referral recommendations based on their concerns and/or preferences. Results underscore the importance of efforts by report developers and physician outreach/education to address physicians’ methodological concerns.

First published on July 2, 2008, doi:10.1177/1077558708319734

Medical Care Research and Review 2008;65:655.

A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?