Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Care Research and Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1077558707312499v1
65/2/207    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Ford, E. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Hospital Responses to the Leapfrop Group in Local Markets

Dennis P. Scanlon, Ph.D1*, Jon B. Christianson, Ph.D2, and Eric W. Ford, Ph.D3

1 The Pennsylvania State University
2 University of Minnesota
3 Texas Tech University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dpscanlon{at}psu.edu.


  Abstract
The Leapfrog (LF) initiative, directed at improving patient safety in hospitals, may be the most ambitious, coordinated attempt to date on the part of large employers to shape the delivery of health care in America. This article assesses the role of market conditions and other factors in influencing hospital responses to LF activities at the community level. Community characteristics were found to be important in explaining hospital participation in a LF safety standards survey at the study sites. However, characteristics of the individual hospitals, and of the LF goals themselves, were more important in explaining the relatively limited progress by hospitals across all sites in achieving those goals over a 5-year period.

First published on January 28, 2008, doi:10.1177/1077558707312499

Medical Care Research and Review 2008;65:207.

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2008

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JAMAHome page
L. P. Kernisan, S. J. Lee, W. J. Boscardin, C. S. Landefeld, and R. A. Dudley
Association Between Hospital-Reported Leapfrog Safe Practices Scores and Inpatient Mortality
JAMA, April 1, 2009; 301(13): 1341 - 1348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]