Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Care Research and Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1077558707305941v1
64/6/623    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dy, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dy, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Instruments for Evaluating Shared Medical Decision Making: A Structured Literature Review

Sydney Morss Dy, MD, MSc*

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and School of Medicine

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sdy{at}jhsph.edu.


  Abstract
The author conducted a structured literature review of instruments for evaluating shared medical decision making. She included relevant instruments that were generalizable beyond specific situations and had been formally evaluated and organized them by domains of values or preferences, information and communication in decision making, and other aspects of decision making. For values or preferences, the author identified 11 instruments, mostly on preferences for roles and information. For information and communication, she found a systematic review of instruments for observational assessment of decision making, 3 additional observational instruments, and 3 questionnaires. For other aspects of decision making, the author identified 3 instruments in domains such as decision self-efficacy and 4 multidimensional instruments. Although instrument development tended to cluster in several areas and there were clear gaps in the literature, the diversity of instruments demonstrates the broad range of constructs involved in assessing shared decision making.

First published on September 5, 2007, doi:10.1177/1077558707305941

Medical Care Research and Review 2007;64:623.

A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2007

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Palliat MedHome page
C Knapp, I. Huang, V Madden, S Vadaparampil, G Quinn, and E Shenkman
An evaluation of two decision-making scales for children with life-limiting illnesses
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2009; 23(6): 518 - 525.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Saf Health CareHome page
O Groene, M J M H Lombarts, N Klazinga, J Alonso, A Thompson, and R Sunol
Is patient-centredness in European hospitals related to existing quality improvement strategies? Analysis of a cross-sectional survey (MARQuIS study)
Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2009; 18(Suppl_1): i44 - i50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]