Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Care Research and Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Young, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, J. F., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Physician Attitudes toward Pay-for-Quality Programs

Perspectives from the Front Line

Gary J. Young

Boston University School of Public Health Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston, health{at}bu.edu

Mark Meterko

Boston University School of Public Health Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston

Bert White

Boston University School of Public Health

Barbara G. Bokhour

Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, Massachusetts Boston University School of Public Health

Karen M. Sautter

Boston University School of Public Health

Dan Berlowitz

Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, Massachusetts Boston University School of Public Health

James F. Burgess, Jr.

Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston Boston University School of Public Health

Pay-for-quality (P4Q) initiatives are becoming an increasingly popular mechanism for improving quality performance and reducing health care costs in the United States. Because these programs often target primary care physicians, it is important to understand how these physicians perceive and respond to P4Q to design successful programs going forward. This study reports results of a survey regarding attitudes toward P4Q among physicians participating in such programs in Massachusetts and California. Findings indicate physicians have generally positive attitudes toward the concept of P4Q, but are ambivalent about certain features of these programs as currently designed and implemented.

Key Words: financial incentives • quality of care • provider payment • pay-for-performance

Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 64, No. 3, 331-343 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1077558707300091
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
N. Menachemi, W. Struchen-Shellhorn, R. G. Brooks, and L. Simpson
Influence of Pay-for-Performance Programs on Information Technology Use Among Child Health Providers: The Devil Is in the Details
Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(Supplement_2): S92 - S96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Med Care Res RevHome page
J. B. Christianson, S. Leatherman, and K. Sutherland
Lessons From Evaluations of Purchaser Pay-for-Performance Programs: A Review of the Evidence
Med Care Res Rev, December 1, 2008; 65(6_suppl): 5S - 35S.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
K. M. Murphy and D. B. Nash
Nonprimary Care Physicians' Views on Office-Based Quality Incentive and Improvement Programs
American Journal of Medical Quality, November 1, 2008; 23(6): 427 - 439.
[Abstract] [PDF]