Medical Care Research and Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 63, No. 6 suppl, 37S-55S (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1077558706293834

Competition in Health Insurance Markets: Limitations of Current Measures for Policy Analysis

Dennis P. Scanlon

Pennsylvania State University

Michael Chernew

University of Michigan

Shailender Swaminathan

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Woolton Lee

Pennsylvania State University

Health care reform proposals often rely on increased competition in health insurance markets to drive improved performance in health care costs, access, and quality. We examine a range of data issues related to the measures of health insurance competition used in empirical studies published from 1994-2004. The literature relies exclusively on market structure and penetration variables to measure competition. While these measures are correlated, the degree of correlation is modest, suggesting that choice of measure could influence empirical results. Moreover, certain measurement issues such as the lack of data on PPO enrollment, the treatment of small firms, and omitted market characteristics also could affect the conclusions in empirical studies. Importantly, other types of measures related to competition (e.g., the availability of information on price and outcomes, degree of entry barriers, etc.) are important from both a theoretical and policy perspective, but their impact on market outcomes has not been widely studied.

Key Words: insurance • managed care • health maintenance organizations (HMOS) • competition • markets


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JAMAHome page
B. E. Landon, E. C. Schneider, S.-L. T. Normand, S. H. Scholle, L. G. Pawlson, and A. M. Epstein
Quality of Care in Medicaid Managed Care and Commercial Health Plans
JAMA, October 10, 2007; 298(14): 1674 - 1681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Med Care Res RevHome page
D. P. Scanlon, S. Swaminathan, M. Chernew, and W. Lee
Market and Plan Characteristics Related to HMO Quality and Improvement.
Med Care Res Rev, December 1, 2006; 63(6 Suppl): 56S - 89S.
[Abstract] [PDF]