Medical Care Research and Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 63, No. 4, 403-426 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1077558706288831
© 2006 SAGE Publications

Reviews

Do Cardiac Surgery Report Cards Reduce Mortality? Assessing the Evidence

Andrew J. Epstein

Yale University School of Medicine

Provider report cards feature prominently in ongoing efforts to improve patient quality. A well-known example is the cardiac surgery report-card program started in New York, which publicly compares hospital and surgeon performance. Public report cards have been associated with decreases in cardiac surgery mortality, but there is substantial disagreement over the source(s) of the improvement. This article develops a conceptual framework to explain how report-card-related responses could result in lower mortality and reviews the evidence. Existing research shows that report cards have not greatly changed referral patterns. How much providers increased their quality of care and altered their selection of patients remains unresolved, and alternative explanations have not been well studied. Future research should expand the number of states and years covered and exploit the variation in institutional features to improve our understanding of the relationship between report cards and outcomes.

Key Words: quality improvement • cardiac surgery • report cards


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
W. H. Ettinger, S. M. Hylka, R. A. Phillips, L. H. Harrison Jr, J. A. Cyr, and A. J. Sussman
When Things Go Wrong: The Impact of Being a Statistical Outlier in Publicly Reported Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Mortality Data
American Journal of Medical Quality, April 1, 2008; 23(2): 90 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. Profit, J. A. F. Zupancic, J. B. Gould, and L. A. Petersen
Implementing Pay-for-Performance in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
Pediatrics, May 1, 2007; 119(5): 975 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
H. M. Krumholz, S.-L. T. Normand, J. A. Spertus, D. M. Shahian, and E. H. Bradley
Measuring Performance For Treating Heart Attacks And Heart Failure: The Case For Outcomes Measurement
Health Aff., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 75 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]