This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Miller, E. A. Articles by Weissert, W. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miller, E. A. Articles by Weissert, W. G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Managed Care Medicaid Medicare Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Strategies for Integrating Medicare and Medicaid: Design Features and Incentives

The University of Michigan

William G. Weissert

The University of Michigan

In a typical third-party payer situation—representative of most U.S. health care delivery—the payer is likely to have interests that are at odds with the patient and provider. The separation and overlap between Medicare and Medicaid for individuals eligible for both programs introduces an additional level of complexity: multiple masters over plans, providers, and patients. This creates opportunities for shifting costs and administrative burdens between states and the federal government, providers and governments, and patients and everyone else. Program designers who wish to minimize unwanted consequences must find ways to structure their programs to produce financial incentives that encourage the pursuit of societal goals, including appropriately shared intergovernmental responsibilities and appropriate plan, provider, and patient behavior. Here the authors review nine federal and state initiatives that use varying strategies to integrate Medicare and Medicaid services for vulnerable populations. For each initiative, the authors examine and critique program design features in three areas: (1) eligibility determination, (2) finance and administration, and (3) service delivery. They find a few strengths and many weaknesses in design. Future efforts would be well served by carefully considering the incentive structures designed into these initiatives and working to improve them in the next generation of Medicare-Medicaid integration efforts.

Key Words: Medicare • Medicaid • integration • capitation • states • demonstration projects • managed care • fragmentation • elderly • disabled • federalism • waivers

Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, 123-157 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1077558703060002001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. C. Grabowski, A. J. O'Malley, and N. R. Barhydt The Costs And Potential Savings Associated With Nursing Home Hospitalizations Health Aff., November 1, 2007; 26(6): 1753 - 1761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Miller and W. G. Weissert Managed Care for Medicare-Medicaid Dual Eligibles: Appropriateness, Availability, Payment, and Policy Journal of Applied Gerontology, December 1, 2004; 23(4): 333 - 348. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. H. Fortinsky, J. R. Fenster, and J. O. Judge Medicare and Medicaid Home Health and Medicaid Waiver Services for Dually Eligible Older Adults: Risk Factors for Use and Correlates of Expenditures Gerontologist, December 1, 2004; 44(6): 739 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]