Medical Care Research and Review

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hadley, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mandelblatt, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hadley, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mandelblatt, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 58, No. 3, 334-360 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/107755870105800303

Medicare Fees and Small Area Variations in Breast-Conserving Surgery among Elderly Women

Jack Hadley

Georgetown University

Jean M. Mitchell

Georgetown University

Jeanne Mandelblatt

Georgetown University

This study used data from Medicare files, the American Hospital Association’s Annual Survey of Hospitals, and the 1990 census to investigate whether Medicare fees for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy (MST) affected the rate of BCS across 799 3digit ZIP code areas in 1994. The full model, which was based on the conceptual framework of the supply of and demand for different treatments, explained 51 percent of the variation in BCS rates. Medicare fees were statistically significant and had the hypothesized effects: a 10 percent higher BCS fee was associated witha7to10percent higher BCS rate, while a 10 percent higher MST fee was associated with a 2 to 3 percent lower proportion receiving BCS. Other significant economic variables were proximity to a radiation therapy hospital, a teaching hospital or a cancer center, and the percentage of elderly women with incomes below the poverty rate, which were negatively related to the BCS rate. Variations in age, race, and metropolitan populations had small or insignificant effects. The single most important variable was the percentage of cases with one or more comorbidities.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. S. Mandelblatt, W. F. Lawrence, J. Cullen, A. L. Stanton, J. L. Krupnick, L. Kwan, and P. A. Ganz
Patterns of Care in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Survivors in the First Year After Cessation of Active Treatment
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 24(1): 77 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
L. O'Neill and J. Kuder
Explaining Variation in Physician Practice Patterns and Their Propensities to Recommend Services
Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 2005; 62(3): 339 - 357.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. Polsky, J. S. Mandelblatt, J. C. Weeks, L. Venditti, Y.-T. Hwang, H. A. Glick, J. Hadley, and K. A. Schulman
Economic Evaluation of Breast Cancer Treatment: Considering the Value of Patient Choice
J. Clin. Oncol., March 15, 2003; 21(6): 1139 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. S. Mandelblatt, S. B. Edge, N. J. Meropol, R. Senie, T. Tsangaris, L. Grey, B. M. Peterson Jr, Y.-T. Hwang, J. Kerner, and J. Weeks
Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes in Older Breast Cancer Survivors: Perceptions Versus Patterns of Care
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2003; 21(5): 855 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]