Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Care Research and Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fortney, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rost, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fortney, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rost, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Provider Choice and Utility Loss due to Selective Contracting in Rural and Urban Areas

John Fortney

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and VA HSR&D Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research

Jean-Claude Thill

State University of New York at Buffalo

Mingliang Zhang

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Naihua Duan

RAND and University of California at Los Angeles

Kathryn Rost

University of Colorado Health Sciences Center

An econometric model estimated the disutility of traveling long distances for depression treatment, and simulations calculated the utility loss associated with selective contracting in rural and urban areas. A representative sample of depression patients (n = 106) and all practicing providers (n = 3,710) in Arkansas were identified and the distances between them were calculated. Using discrete choice analysis, patient preferences for provider type and travel distance were estimated. Simulations calculated the utility loss associated with alternative scenarios of selective contracting. Provider type and distance were significant predictors of provider choice. To equate the utility loss associated with selective contracting in rural and urban areas, a slightly higher proportion of rural physicians and a substantially higher proportion of rural mental health specialists must be contracted. To avoid further reductions in geographic access, managed care organizations should contract with a higher proportion of rural providers than urban providers.

Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 58, No. 1, 60-75 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/107755870105800104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
K. Rost, J. Fortney, E. Fischer, and J. Smith
Use, Quality, and Outcomes of Care for Mental Health: The Rural Perspective
Med Care Res Rev, September 1, 2002; 59(3): 231 - 265.
[Abstract] [PDF]