Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Care Research and Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Doty, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Doty, H. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Are Managed Care Plans Organizing for Quality?

Dennis P. Scanlon

Pennsylvania State University

Elizabeth Rolph

RAND Corporation

Charles Darby

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Center for Quality Measurement and Improvement

Hilary E. Doty

Pennsylvania State University

This article examines the degree to which managed care organizations (MCOs) are reorganizing to take responsibility for the quality of care and service they provide. Specifically, factors prompting plans to focus on quality improvement (QI) and how they may be building the capacity to improve quality are considered. The authors’ analysis is based on executive interviews with the plan medical directors, QI directors, and chief executive officers (CEOs) in a sample of 24 health plans. The overall response rate was 58.3 percent (medical director = 62.5 percent, QI director = 79.2 percent, CEO = 33.3 percent). The authors queried respondents about (1) perceived drivers and obstacles to the development of an effective QI program, (2) plan organizational structure for QI, and (3) technical capacities for data collection, management, and performance measurement. The results suggest that MCOsare responding to outside pressures to engage in QI. They are reorganizing their management structures and more slowly and tentatively are building technical capacity for QI.

Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 57, No. 3 suppl, 9-32 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/1077558700573002
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?