Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Care Research and Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bentley, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bentley, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Impact of Oregon’s Priority List on Medicaid Beneficiaries

Janet B. Mitchell

Health Economics Research, Inc.

Fred Bentley

Health Economics Research, Inc.

Since Oregon’s controversial priority list was implemented in 1994, there has been only anecdotal evidence available on its possible impact on Medicaid beneficiaries. The authors surveyed over 1,400 beneficiaries to determine how often a service was denied because it was below the line, what kinds of services these represent, and any resulting health impact. About one third of all respondents reported that they had needed a service that Medicaid would not cover; in 38 percent of these cases, the reason was that the service was below the line. Frequently mentioned services included hernia repair, chiropractic treatment, dental splints, and newborn circumcision. About half of the respondents received the service anyway, often by paying for it themselves. Of those unsuccessful in getting the service, many reported that their health had worsened as a result. However, there was no evidence that getting (or not getting) the service had a causal impact on health status.

Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 57, No. 2, 216-234 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/107755870005700205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
W. Cho, S. Lee, H.-Y. Kang, and M. Kang
Setting national priorities for quality assessment of health care services in Korea
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, April 1, 2005; 17(2): 157 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
J. B. Mitchell, S. G. Haber, G. Khatutsky, and S. Donoghue
Children in the Oregon Health Plan: How have they Fared?
Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 2002; 59(2): 166 - 183.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. B. Mitchell, G. Khatutsky, and N. L. Swigonski
Impact of the Oregon Health Plan on Children With Special Health Care Needs
Pediatrics, April 1, 2001; 107(4): 736 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
B. C. Vladeck
Commentary
Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 2000; 57(2): 235 - 242.
[PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
M. C. Hornbrook
Commentary
Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 2000; 57(2): 243 - 251.
[PDF]