Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Care Research and Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sarnoff, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rundall, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sarnoff, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rundall, T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Flu
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Influenza Immunization Rates among High-Risk Population Groups

Rhonda Sarnoff

University of California—Berkeley

Thomas Rundall

University of California—Berkeley

Public health interventions have been developed to increase influenza immunization rates among the high-risk elders and patients suffering from cardiopulmonary, metabolic, and other chronic conditions. The relative effectiveness of alternative intervention strategies is not yet well understood. Determination of the most effective strategy should consider characteristics of the target population and the health care delivery system. This meta-analysis of intervention evaluation studies highlights the importance of considering the baseline immunization rate of the target population in selecting the most effective strategy. While the analysis confirms the feasibility of achieving the 60 percent target coverage established in Healthy People 2000, the results also suggest that as coverage levels increase, single-faceted patient-focused interventions may need to be strengthened by the addition of complementary changes in provider behaviors and/or the delivery system. Further research is needed to identify the most cost-effective combination of intervention strategies, particularly in populations with higher immunization coverage.

Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 55, No. 4, 432-456 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/107755879805500403


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
G. R. Gamble, A. O. Goldstein, and R. S. Bearman
Implementing a Standing Order Immunization Policy: A Minimalist Intervention
J Am Board Fam Med, January 1, 2008; 21(1): 38 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. Woodhead, F. Blasi, S. Ewig, G. Huchon, M. Leven, A. Ortqvist, T. Schaberg, A. Torres, G. van der Heijden, and T. J. M. Verheij
Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2005; 26(6): 1138 - 1180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]