Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Care Research and Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cromwell, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ammering, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cromwell, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ammering, C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Medicaid
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Programmatic, Economic, and Demographic Forces Underlying Medicaid Enrollment Trends

Jerry Cromwell

Center for Health Economics Research

Killard W Adamache

Center for Health Economics Research

Rezaul K. Khandker

Center for Health Economics Research

Carol Ammering

Center for Health Economics Research

This article examines the enrollment effects of congressionally mandated Medicaid coverage during the late 1980s. Child-related mandates were found to increase noncash enrollments 37% in states without a medically needy program, while the 1990 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Acts legislation added another 27%—mostly elderly poor. The evidence suggests states responded to the mandates, in part, by shifting cash welfare children and their families to Medicaid-only status. Without continued mandates, the shift to unrestricted Medicaid block grants will likely raise the number of uninsured (mostly children) 30% or more in nonmedically needy states versus 10% to 20% in other states. Federal Medicaid matching was found to be an inadequate incentive for states to extend health insurance coverage to all of their poor. Cyclic variation in state economies is also found to put the poor at risk of disenrollment given state laws requiring balanced budgets.

Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 54, No. 2, 150-175 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/107755879705400204


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
C. Harrington, J. T. Mullan, and H. Carrillo
State Nursing Home Enforcement Systems
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2004; 29(1): 43 - 74.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
E. E. Pracht and W. J. Moore
Interest Groups and State Medicaid Drug Programs
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2003; 28(1): 9 - 40.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
W. J. Moore, K. Gutermuth, and E. E. Pracht
Systemwide Effects of Medicaid Retrospective Drug Utilization Review Programs
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, August 1, 2000; 25(4): 653 - 688.
[Abstract] [PDF]