Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Care Research and Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenkranz, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Luft, H. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenkranz, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Luft, H. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Expenditure Models for Prospective Risk Adjustment: Choosing the Measure Appropriate for the Problem

Susan L. Rosenkranz

Harvard Pilgrim Health Care

Harold S. Luft

University of California, San Francisco

Risk adjustment models for health care expenditures typically have been disappointing in their predictive ability for individual enrollees. However, practical applications of risk adjustment often involve groups, not individuals. Therefore, model performance on groups of enrollees may be more meaningful than performance on individuals. The authors propose a new measure of model fit, the sorted-group R2, which measures the correlation between predicted and actual cost averages for groups of enrollees sorted by risk prior to grouping. The authors use this tool to evaluate four models with different explanatory variables and functional complexities. Results indicate that even a model which performs poorly for individual subscriber units and for unselected groups can indeed distinguish between groups of subscriber units where there has been moderate risk selection.

Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 54, No. 2, 123-143 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/107755879705400201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
W. P. Welch
Commentary
Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 1997; 54(2): 144 - 147.
[PDF]