This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Santerre, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Santerre, R. E. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Effect of the ACOG Guideline on Vaginal Births after Cesarean

Bentley College

In October 1988, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued a physician practice guideline stating that a prior cesarean section is no longer a reason for performing a repeat C-section. Using a panel data set consisting of 55 Massachusetts hospitals over the years 1987 to 1991, this study examines if the ACOG guideline had any impact on the practice of vaginal births after cesarean (VBACs) at the typical hospital. The empirical results suggest that the ACOG guideline led to a permanent 5.6 percentage point increase in the VBAC rate, ceteris paribus. As a result, the study suggests that practice guidelines do sometimes work. The information dissemination role of the popular press may provide the reason why the AGOG guideline influenced the practice of VBACs.

Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, 315-329 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/107755879605300306


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?