Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

Click here to browse AJSM online!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Medical Care Research and Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Vistnes, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Vistnes, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Who Belongs to HMOs: A Comparison of Fee-for-Service versus HMO Enrollees

Amy K. Taylor

Agency for Health Care Policy and Research

Karen M. Beauregard

Agency for Health Care Policy and Research

Jessica P. Vistnes

Agency for Health Care Policy and Research

As employers have turned to managed care to curtail the rising cost of health care benefits, the number of HMO enrollees has proliferated. Between 1984 and 1994, HMO enrollment incrased from approximately 15 million to over 49 million individuals. Although research has indicated that HMOs have been effective in limiting medical costs, there is mixed evidence in the literature on how they achieve these savings. This article uses data from the 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey to examine one hypothesis for these patterns: that HMOs enroll a healthier population than fee-for-service plans. To test this hypothesis we examine HMO andjee-for-evice enrollees with respect to sxioeconomic variables such as age, race, sex, income, education, health status, and location. Our results indicate that HMOs tend to enroll a younger but not much healthier population than traditional fee-for-service plans, suggesting that self-selection is not a major contriutor to HMO cost savings.

Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 52, No. 3, 389-408 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/107755879505200304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
E. Schaefer and J. D. Reschovsky
Are HMO Enrollees Healthier Than Others? Results From The Community Tracking Study
Health Aff., May 1, 2002; 21(3): 249 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
L. Shi
Vulnerable Populations and Health Insurance
Med Care Res Rev, March 1, 2000; 57(1): 110 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
L. W. Morton
Medicaid Enrollment Choice into Managed Care Health Plans
Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 1998; 55(2): 211 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
D. F. Cox and C. Hogan
Biased Selection and Medicare HMOs: Analysis of the 1989-1994 Experience
Med Care Res Rev, September 1, 1997; 54(3): 259 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
R. M. Weinick and K. M. Beauregard
Women's Use of Preventive Screening Services: A Comparison of HMO versus Fee-for-Service Enrollees
Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 1997; 54(2): 176 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
T. Fama and A. Bernstein
A Comparison of Physician and Hospital Use among the Nonelderly Covered by HMOs and Indemnity Insurance
Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 1997; 54(2): 239 - 254.
[Abstract] [PDF]